ellyssian: (Default)


Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne

The thing I found myself wondering most often while reading this was how much of the various scientific names and so forth thrown about was cutting edge for the time it was written, and how much - beyond the Nautilus itself - was fiction.

As one of the earliest science fiction novels, it doesn't skimp on the science: much of the text in quite a few chapters is spent describing the lifeforms seen swimming past the viewing window - or rooted firm to the corals and such.

Although those same descriptions will likely turn some off, those not interested in oceanography or, at least, the classification of marine biology, can still enjoy the adventure. For those with interests in anachrotech, this is an in-depth study of the imagination and the technology of an earlier period.
ellyssian: (Default)


The Pink Panther, starring Peter Sellers

The classic original, which [livejournal.com profile] patrixa sent us so that Justin could counteract his experience with the Steve Martin version he had watched during the summer. He definitely prefers the original.

I can no more detach the role of the clueless detective with Peter Sellers than I can think of him in any other role - and I've heard he's done at least one unrelated project. =)

This movie is one of those - like a variety of films from Arsenic & Old Lace to Monty Python and the Holy Grail that exemplify what, exactly, a comedy film should be. Even when they remake it, they seem to lose the idea at the heart of it - what, exactly, funny is. The earlier films didn't need a laugh track to cue the funny reflex - they handled it another way, by legitimately being entertaining and funny. Funny is not an exact science, but it certainly seems to be a lost art.

All that aside, how can you go wrong with a couple of gorillas involved in the car chase at the end?
ellyssian: (Default)
Book #31: White Fang by Jack London

Justin read this for school last year, and they decided to check out the movie. After watching the movie, he couldn't remember what parts were accurate or less than so, and I wondered. So I read (re-read, if you want to count my first read x decades ago) it last night.

The book and the movie, I decided, barely know each other. They may have met in a bar one night, somewhere in the Yukon, and shared a drink or two. The movie is a fun, upbeat adventure story. The book talks a lot about gods, and how mankind are gods to the dogs. It's an old book, two years younger than the boat I'll be eating dinner on tomorrow night, and it most certainly carries many of the prejudices of the time.

But that is what it should do - it was not written for today, and it should not be sanitized, nor should some of those attitudes be idolized. Figuring out which parts can be learned from, and, more importantly, how they should be learned from, is the key.

Cross-posted to [livejournal.com profile] 50bookchallenge and me own journal

Profile

ellyssian: (Default)
Mina Ellyse

November 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags