Self-Serving Congress?
Feb. 9th, 2006 12:37 pmUS Congress staff altering Wikipedia entries to make senators look better - or worse
Wow. I am surprised and shocked that people we elect might hire people who would do something like that - from changing "liberal" to "activist", removing voting records that show which side your own, to removing campaign promises that haven't been met. Seriously, "business as usual" should not be acceptable when it comes to such things. Honor and integrity are qualities that the senators - and their staff - should possess without needing to have it edited in by a well-meaning or poorly directed flunkie.
I didn't look further, but it is interesting to see how I discovered this article on a UK source.
Wow. I am surprised and shocked that people we elect might hire people who would do something like that - from changing "liberal" to "activist", removing voting records that show which side your own, to removing campaign promises that haven't been met. Seriously, "business as usual" should not be acceptable when it comes to such things. Honor and integrity are qualities that the senators - and their staff - should possess without needing to have it edited in by a well-meaning or poorly directed flunkie.
I didn't look further, but it is interesting to see how I discovered this article on a UK source.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-09 10:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-10 07:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-10 07:56 am (UTC)In a reply to a friend's post yesterday, I mentioned how the behavior of a certain shrubbery was similar to that of dysfunctional managers in the business world - unfortunately, that observation's not limited to just the upper management.
As I pointed out then, if I worked for a manager like that, I would (and I have) taken my employment elsewhere. Very comforting to know that our government displays those childish, self-absorbed attitudes.