Yes. Unfortunately.
It is in the... I hesitate to call it "prose" or "fiction" or anything good... featured in this post (don't clicky at work; when you die of laughter or sheer pain of bad writing, they'll write you up posthumously for reading stuff that's not safe for work at work...) by
vandonovan...
It's got to be.
I mean, really, two pages describing the sexual attractiveness of a character, that's just a bit much. "Her tongue was a ferret," and "Her thighs were geese" would sound completely, well, wrong, just by themselves, but when you put them in context: "Her tongue was a ferret, an anemone, a fox caught in the teeth of a tiger." and "Her thighs were geese, pythons, schooners." ~ it's then that you really start to wonder how the author ever got published.
"Her face had the fragrance of a gibbous moon."
Hmmm... so that's what that stench is...
It is in the... I hesitate to call it "prose" or "fiction" or anything good... featured in this post (don't clicky at work; when you die of laughter or sheer pain of bad writing, they'll write you up posthumously for reading stuff that's not safe for work at work...) by
It's got to be.
I mean, really, two pages describing the sexual attractiveness of a character, that's just a bit much. "Her tongue was a ferret," and "Her thighs were geese" would sound completely, well, wrong, just by themselves, but when you put them in context: "Her tongue was a ferret, an anemone, a fox caught in the teeth of a tiger." and "Her thighs were geese, pythons, schooners." ~ it's then that you really start to wonder how the author ever got published.
"Her face had the fragrance of a gibbous moon."
Hmmm... so that's what that stench is...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 05:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 05:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 05:18 pm (UTC)Upon Reflection
Date: 2009-03-11 05:18 pm (UTC)~M~
Re: Upon Reflection
Date: 2009-03-11 05:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 05:31 pm (UTC)Her fingers were the speed of fish.
lucky to get away with just a stabbing
Date: 2009-03-11 05:33 pm (UTC)~M~
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 05:35 pm (UTC)Not necessarily good, but certainly jaw-dropping.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 05:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:35 pm (UTC)That's so hot it's explosive.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:40 pm (UTC)"Her ribs were a niche, an alcove, an apse; her stomach was an idol in the niche, alcove or apse, an effigy, a phantom."
"Her shoulders were fieldstones; they were the white square stones of which walls are made."
"Her feet were springs, marmosets or locusts; her toes were snails, they were snails with shells of tears."
-- because you can't clicky, there's a few more gems for you. You don't have to thank me, I know I don't deserve it.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:44 pm (UTC)It's like it was done by a randomly-generated-noun program, for crying out loud. None of this makes any sense.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:51 pm (UTC)It either makes no sense whatsoever or creates very unflattering images ~ for instance, he compares something to a wheat field newly harvested, which one commenter has indicated means "rat-infested stubble, basically" (I'll leave it to the imagination as to which part of the body this is describing, which should narrow down the choices quite a bit... =)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:56 pm (UTC)(You had to use that word, didn't you?)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 06:59 pm (UTC)And, truth to tell, one doesn't really want to.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 07:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 07:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 07:53 pm (UTC)i cant believe he used "pubes"
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 08:28 pm (UTC)Are you sure the quoted writing was supposed to be taken seriously? Is the author pulling everyreader's leg?
Or maybe it's proof that a herd of monkeys typing hours on end will NOT turn out Shakespeare?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 09:02 pm (UTC):: ducks ::
Although I don't know if they call gazelle horns a rack, that might just be reserved for antlers...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 09:05 pm (UTC)It is surmised that an editor "corrected" that for him.
Of course, it's also surmised that the editor couldn't stand it and didn't read this bit, which is why it made it into print. Or that the editor had been blackmailed into leaving it in.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 09:07 pm (UTC)Follow the link and read the whole two pages. Just have a bar of soap, or bleach, or industrial strength sulfuric acid handy to scrub your brain cells clean afterward.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 09:28 pm (UTC)I followed the comments, too -- well, 4 pages of them and then gave up. Wonder if all this blogging on it will increase sales.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 11:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-11 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:31 am (UTC)There was once a time when Publishers hired Editors that actually edited. These days they are simply the market-droid coordinator.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:38 am (UTC)or perhaps it was printed in an alternate reality. Due to this unfortunate happenstance, civilization collapsed when the eyes and brains of all literate persons exploded. The force of the explosion and the collapse opened a wormhole, and all remaining copies were dumped into our unsuspecting bookstores. Thankfully, in our universe, we are so used to drivel and crap in our books and TV that we've become immune to even the most brain bleeding works and thus we are left to discuss on our humble LJ
This would also explain Twilight
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:48 am (UTC)Ouch. (But in a good damn-I-agree-with-you way!)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 01:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 02:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 02:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 03:42 am (UTC)