Goblins in the House
Jun. 17th, 2005 09:04 amLast night, I was thinking about the Goblin drama in Tamson House - flavored by completion of The Wild Wood, which tangled and writhed through my thoughts in conjunction with the Goblins and all on its own as well - and it came to me that the Goblins were fairly typical de Lint characters.
This adds credence to some of the theories that they are not, in fact real; a fabrication of a de Lintian character on a list spiraling (sometimes out of control) around de Lint would not be surprising in the least. I'm starting not to see it that way, though. I haven't spoken with the Goblins directly, but several others have, and some things are starting to click.
Mr. G is a common supporting archetype - not all that bright, and not one to carry a DSM-IV around in his backpocket with which to diagnose mental illness, but with his heart in the right place. He'd fit in on the streets of Newford, trying his best to help folks out, but critically flawed, and perhaps saying "manic" and "committed to a psych ward" when he really means "diagnosis pending, possibly bipolar, with a side order of diabetes" and "emergency room." Although not a mistake one *should* make, it is in keeping with the character.
Mrs. G probably wouldn't fit the leading-waif archetype, but she would also be fairly common on the streets of Newford. An artist, a writer, with eccentricity that is both quaint, cloying, and moving into the realm that requires medical treatment. In Newford, she would quite possibly be living on the street, or close enough to it - certainly from the "wrong side of the tracks." She would charm some, scare others, and annoy the rest. She shows smatterings of understanding and education, but also completely misses the ball on some subjects, showing a naivety that seems bewildering.
Any thoughts, especially from those who talked with one or both?
This adds credence to some of the theories that they are not, in fact real; a fabrication of a de Lintian character on a list spiraling (sometimes out of control) around de Lint would not be surprising in the least. I'm starting not to see it that way, though. I haven't spoken with the Goblins directly, but several others have, and some things are starting to click.
Mr. G is a common supporting archetype - not all that bright, and not one to carry a DSM-IV around in his backpocket with which to diagnose mental illness, but with his heart in the right place. He'd fit in on the streets of Newford, trying his best to help folks out, but critically flawed, and perhaps saying "manic" and "committed to a psych ward" when he really means "diagnosis pending, possibly bipolar, with a side order of diabetes" and "emergency room." Although not a mistake one *should* make, it is in keeping with the character.
Mrs. G probably wouldn't fit the leading-waif archetype, but she would also be fairly common on the streets of Newford. An artist, a writer, with eccentricity that is both quaint, cloying, and moving into the realm that requires medical treatment. In Newford, she would quite possibly be living on the street, or close enough to it - certainly from the "wrong side of the tracks." She would charm some, scare others, and annoy the rest. She shows smatterings of understanding and education, but also completely misses the ball on some subjects, showing a naivety that seems bewildering.
Any thoughts, especially from those who talked with one or both?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 07:28 am (UTC)If she is bipolar, I don't hold out much, if any, hope. It's an extremely hard disease to treat, it's very hard to get the right meds cocktail, and frankly, I don't think she even wants to fix anything.
No, haven't spoken to her, nor do I want to, frankly. And I still remain skeptical of the whole thing.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 07:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 07:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 07:58 am (UTC)So my hypothesis that the Goblins are Frank gathers a bit of momentum?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 08:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 08:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 09:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 10:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 10:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 11:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 12:11 pm (UTC)Sometimes it's neither quality or content of the attention, rather the quantity that satisfies that sort of condition.
If so, we're all doing a wonderful job to help her out by discussing, pondering, throwing hands up in disgust, and so on.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 12:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 09:25 pm (UTC)In the real world, I am fairly good in observing and drawing accurate conclusions about people and situations. It is harder online. There is no doubt, she is intelligent and extremely creative. It is the irrational and manipulative tendencies that really concern me. I see an opportunist. All those elements mixed in together, set off warning bells in my head. I believe I used the word *psychotic*, on one occasion.
All that being said, thanks to Ms. G, I've learned a great deal about the list and it's members. It probably would have happened anyway, but it wasn't boring, eh?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 11:01 pm (UTC)I don't really see what's so hard about formatting posts correctly.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-17 11:14 pm (UTC)Although, if you want something fun to read, check out her son's LJ. He seems to coroborate a lot of this. Also, he's not on TH.
I'm not sure if I should have posted the LJ link, but he's not on my friends list anymore and the entries are public, sooo...